Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Wednesday, 14 February 2018
If books be the food of love, read on! Happy International Book Giving Day and Valentine's Day, we have some lovey-dovey suggestions for loved up pressies!
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
February 14, 2018
Labels:
14th February,
Books,
International Book Giving Day,
Love,
Reading,
Valentine's Day
It's amazing to think that two fantastic things happen on the same day every year.
International Book Giving Day and Valentine's Day coincide annually and we reckon that books make the most romantic presents to give to your loved ones.
There are, of course, as many children's books about love as there are songs about the moon (and if you get that reference, you can be in my gang) so let's have a look at a few beauties from recent years that we truly genuinely love to bits ourselves.
First is "I Love You Stick Insect" by Chris Naylor-Ballesteros. It's the adorable tale of a stick insect who seems doomed to be alone, until he meets the object of his desires.
His friends are a little embarrased though and don't want to point out the obvious - that his new lady love is, in fact, a stick.
The story hinges on the perfect awkwardness of seeing someone so blissfully happy in their ignorance that their friends don't know if it's the right thing to do - to break the spell, to tell the poor lovesick individual the truth. You know what it's like when you're the friend of someone who is so recklessly intent on their love that they do not see disaster ahead.
"I Love You Stick Insect" by Chris Naylor-Ballesteros is out now, published by Bloomsbury.
Next, a book we loved to absolute bits when we first encountered it.
"Sardines of Love" by Zurine Aguirre is a heart-meltingly beautiful story of two loved-up old folk (and that reminds me, here is the perfect example of a children's book about adults with no supporting child characters in it - AHA!)
They have their differences - in fact Grandad Lolo loves nothing better than scoffing Sardines (bleugh!)
Grandma Lola isn't quite as easily won over by these (extremely good for you but nevertheless gross) culinary delights. But when Lola decides to stock up on her hubby's favourite food on a fateful fishing trip, she goes missing.
Trapped in an Octopus's tummy, Lola soon realises that she'll starve unless she eats the one plentiful supply of food to hand. Yep, you've guessed it, sardines!
There are so many deft and wonderful little touches in this book, and it's utterly and completely romantic too.
"Sardines of Love" by Zurine Aguirre is out now, published by Child's Play
More highly original and romantic loveliness now in "When an Elephant Falls in Love" by Davide Cali and Alice Lotti.
Ah, unrequited love. Is there any greater pain to be in as a hopelessly romantic soul? (I speak from experience - NO!)
Elephant is in love but sadly the object of his affection doesn't even know he exists, so he spends a lot of time staring at the clouds in the sky, writing terrible poetry, making sure he's clean and tidy and dressed to the nines (that all sounds horribly familiar).
Feeling warm and fuzzy yet? Suitably loved up? No, well let us tempt you with more storytelling morsels...
Digging back into the archives now for something of an overlooked classic...
In "Jennifer Jones Won't Leave Me Alone" a young boy receives a lot of rather unwanted attention from the new girl in class.
It's a bit awkward when someone spends all their time chasing you around, giving you the gooey eyes and cooing at you every opportunity they get. So the poor nameless boy in this story squirms, blushes, wriggles and is rather embarrased - until Jennifer Jones moves away and he realises he actually rather misses her kissy-kissy faces and invasions of personal space.
Honestly, the rhymes in this just trip off the tongue, Neal Layton is as brilliant as ever with some crackingly great illustrations for this - and we really urge you to hunt down a copy - just like Jennifer Jones hunts down the object of her affections. Awwww! We loved it enough to make it book of the week back in the day, and we're pretty sure you'll love it too.
"Jennifer Jones Won't Leave Me Alone" by Frieda Wishinsky and Neal Layton is out now, published by DoubleDay.
I think we've got time for one more, there's always time for love, right?
This time the object of our booky affection is the gorgeously gothic and wonderful "Princess Decomposia and Count Spatula" by Andi (Gum Girl) Watson.
This one was a bit of a slide under our radar but ended up being one of the contributing graphic novels to C's current obsession with all things comic.
A true love story, a child friendly one at that - and there's cake! I mean what more can you say of a story that pays subtle homage to all the classic vampire stories, and cooks up such a cool premise. A mysterious baker with a heart of gold, set to win over the King's daughter with his elegance and charm.
It's well worth finding and it's such a beautifully touching story that it deserves a place in our rather offbeat Valentine's Day lineup (and of course would make the PERFECT giveaway on Book Giving Day, just like all the other titles here!)
"Princess Decomposia and Count Spatula" by Andi Watson is out now, published by First Second.
Happy Valentine's Day and Happy Book Giving Day xxxxx
Read More
International Book Giving Day and Valentine's Day coincide annually and we reckon that books make the most romantic presents to give to your loved ones.
There are, of course, as many children's books about love as there are songs about the moon (and if you get that reference, you can be in my gang) so let's have a look at a few beauties from recent years that we truly genuinely love to bits ourselves.
First is "I Love You Stick Insect" by Chris Naylor-Ballesteros. It's the adorable tale of a stick insect who seems doomed to be alone, until he meets the object of his desires.
His friends are a little embarrased though and don't want to point out the obvious - that his new lady love is, in fact, a stick.
The story hinges on the perfect awkwardness of seeing someone so blissfully happy in their ignorance that their friends don't know if it's the right thing to do - to break the spell, to tell the poor lovesick individual the truth. You know what it's like when you're the friend of someone who is so recklessly intent on their love that they do not see disaster ahead.
"I Love You Stick Insect" by Chris Naylor-Ballesteros is out now, published by Bloomsbury.
Next, a book we loved to absolute bits when we first encountered it.
"Sardines of Love" by Zurine Aguirre is a heart-meltingly beautiful story of two loved-up old folk (and that reminds me, here is the perfect example of a children's book about adults with no supporting child characters in it - AHA!)
They have their differences - in fact Grandad Lolo loves nothing better than scoffing Sardines (bleugh!)
Grandma Lola isn't quite as easily won over by these (extremely good for you but nevertheless gross) culinary delights. But when Lola decides to stock up on her hubby's favourite food on a fateful fishing trip, she goes missing.
Trapped in an Octopus's tummy, Lola soon realises that she'll starve unless she eats the one plentiful supply of food to hand. Yep, you've guessed it, sardines!
There are so many deft and wonderful little touches in this book, and it's utterly and completely romantic too.
"Sardines of Love" by Zurine Aguirre is out now, published by Child's Play
More highly original and romantic loveliness now in "When an Elephant Falls in Love" by Davide Cali and Alice Lotti.
Ah, unrequited love. Is there any greater pain to be in as a hopelessly romantic soul? (I speak from experience - NO!)
Elephant is in love but sadly the object of his affection doesn't even know he exists, so he spends a lot of time staring at the clouds in the sky, writing terrible poetry, making sure he's clean and tidy and dressed to the nines (that all sounds horribly familiar).
But if his lady elephant love doesn't know who he is, what on earth will he do?
Love goes hand in hand with hope, and there's a lovely surprise at the end of the book for our poor lovelorn chap. We do love a happy romantic ending and this gorgeously presented book is a delight (hint: If you get the hardback version of this, look under the wraparound cover!)
"When an Elephant Falls in Love" by Davide Cali and Alice Lotti is out now, published by Chronicle.
Feeling warm and fuzzy yet? Suitably loved up? No, well let us tempt you with more storytelling morsels...
Digging back into the archives now for something of an overlooked classic...
In "Jennifer Jones Won't Leave Me Alone" a young boy receives a lot of rather unwanted attention from the new girl in class.
It's a bit awkward when someone spends all their time chasing you around, giving you the gooey eyes and cooing at you every opportunity they get. So the poor nameless boy in this story squirms, blushes, wriggles and is rather embarrased - until Jennifer Jones moves away and he realises he actually rather misses her kissy-kissy faces and invasions of personal space.
Honestly, the rhymes in this just trip off the tongue, Neal Layton is as brilliant as ever with some crackingly great illustrations for this - and we really urge you to hunt down a copy - just like Jennifer Jones hunts down the object of her affections. Awwww! We loved it enough to make it book of the week back in the day, and we're pretty sure you'll love it too.
"Jennifer Jones Won't Leave Me Alone" by Frieda Wishinsky and Neal Layton is out now, published by DoubleDay.
I think we've got time for one more, there's always time for love, right?
This time the object of our booky affection is the gorgeously gothic and wonderful "Princess Decomposia and Count Spatula" by Andi (Gum Girl) Watson.
This one was a bit of a slide under our radar but ended up being one of the contributing graphic novels to C's current obsession with all things comic.
A true love story, a child friendly one at that - and there's cake! I mean what more can you say of a story that pays subtle homage to all the classic vampire stories, and cooks up such a cool premise. A mysterious baker with a heart of gold, set to win over the King's daughter with his elegance and charm.
It's well worth finding and it's such a beautifully touching story that it deserves a place in our rather offbeat Valentine's Day lineup (and of course would make the PERFECT giveaway on Book Giving Day, just like all the other titles here!)
"Princess Decomposia and Count Spatula" by Andi Watson is out now, published by First Second.
Happy Valentine's Day and Happy Book Giving Day xxxxx
Thursday, 15 June 2017
It's time for the Lollies 2017 - What fantastic books will make you laugh out loud? Pick a winner and vote for your faves at home or with your classmates at school!
It's time once again for one of the most rib-tickling book awards of the year, the 2017 Laugh out Loud Book Awards from Scholastic.
All the books will be available via Scholastic's dedicated Lollies shop page so click here to grab a few books for yourself or your school: https://shop.scholastic.co.uk/lollies
There's a superb selection of titles nominated this year in several categories. Feast your eyes on each of the category noms below. Click a link to see our review of some of the books in this fantastic selection:
Picture Books Shortlist
Oi, Dog! by Kes Gray and Jim Field (Hodder)
Eat your People by Lou Kuenzler and David Woitowicz (Orchard Books)
Prince of Pants by Alan Macdonald and Sarah McIntyre (Scholastic)
Danny McGee Drinks the Sea by Andy Stanton and Neal Layton (Hodder Children's Books)
6-8 Years Shortlist
Thimble Monkey Superstar by John Blake and Martin Chatterton (Firefly Press)
Hamish and the Neverpeople by Danny Wallace and Jamie Littler (Simon and Schuster)
Eddy Stone and the Epic Holiday Mash Up by Simon Cherry (Usborne Publishing)
Future Ratboy and the Invasion of the Nom Noms by Jim Smith (Jelly Pie / Egmont)
9-13 Years Shortlist
I Don't Like Poetry by Joshua Seigal (Bloomsbury)
The Best Medicine by Christine Hamil (Little Island Books)
My Gym Teacher is an Alien Overlord by David Solomons and Laura Ellen Anderson (Nosy Crow)
Animalcolm by David Baddiel and Jim Field (HarperCollins Children's Books)
Wednesday, 6 January 2016
Love books? Then what better day to celebrate International Book Giving Day 2016 than Valentine's Day (14th February)
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
January 06, 2016
Labels:
Ben Newman,
Books,
IBGD,
International Book Giving Day 2016
BLAMMO! Today we can reveal the utterly fantastic official poster for International Book Giving Day 2016, by Ben (Professor AstroCat) Newman. All over the world, people will be celebrating Valentine's Day but why not also show your deep love of all things booky by participating in IBGD!
You can find out more about International Book Giving Day on the Official Website - in the meantime download and print out this fantastic poster to get things under way!
Get connected and LOVE those books!
Thursday, 29 October 2015
Reading Non-Fiction titles outside school - why it's more important than ever! A ReadItDaddy Editorial
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
October 29, 2015
Labels:
A ReadItDaddy Editorial,
Books,
National Non-Fiction November,
Reading non-fiction for pleasure
November is "National Non-Fiction Month" and this week's editorial is inspired not only by the upcoming celebration of children's Non-Fiction titles - but by a fairly innocent looking Tweet from author Nicola Morgan: https://twitter.com/nicolamorgan/status/657296292671000576
It's been widely reported many, many times that reluctant readers - particularly boys but definitely both boys and girls - are quite often more interested in non-fiction than fiction. I can't quite remember how it first came about that we made huge efforts to stimulate Charlotte's reading with a good mix of fiction and non-fiction titles but it was certainly quite soon after we'd joined our local library for the first time.
For children, libraries can often be the only place they'll be exposed to 'learning books' outside of school but for most kids, it's also the place where they are in direct control of what they read - and what non-fiction titles they pick up alongside story and picture books.
That's hugely important, and from the outset it's really quite something to see a child going through the non-fiction section in a library's stacks and seeing what they pull out.
Charlotte's love of history and science stems directly from the way we gently coaxed her towards digging out books in the non-fiction section - often gloriously illustrated and packed full of facts, these books tell their own stories to children and definitely in the case of history books, are often as full of amazing characters and 'plot twists' as any story book you can name.
I doubt many teachers would actively discourage a child from reading non-fiction for pleasure (so I'm rather intrigued by the background to this tweet). After all, a huge part of a teacher's role is to engage their class with the subject matter at hand - so if a child displays enough interest in the subject to want to explore it outside school as well, what's not to love?
Unless...there's some bizarre theory that non-fiction should not be 'dumbed down'. It should be wholly academic, perhaps some might say even 'dry' so it does not muddy the message it's trying to impart. Perhaps it's that we're now so petrified that our children won't learn if they're having fun that children's non-fiction is somehow frowned upon?
If that's the case, again I'd have to disagree and point out that you'd have to search high and low to find a non-fiction title these days that 'dumbs down' its subject - simply because kids will not put up with that in their non-fiction reading matter just like they won't put up with poorly written (or illustrated) fiction (and gawd, how many times do we have to point this out to would-be children's writers - that children are not there to be babied or patronised with hollow stories that don't inspire them or satisfy their curiosity?)
It does seem that it's long been the belief that a certain amount of 'talking down to' is required when you're broaching certain topics and subjects with kids (again whether in fictional or non-fictional titles) and I'd have to once again vociferously argue that this truly is not the case. Kids are like hungry sponges when it comes to facts and figures. You wouldn't try to wash with a sponge that was only given a tiny drip of water would you?
Do celebrate National Non-Fiction Month again this November as many book folk will be doing so! Mix it up a bit in your own children's reading materials for that month and I promise you, you'll be very pleasantly surprised by the results! Go seek out brilliant books by publishers like Usborne, Flying Eye Books, Wide Eyed Editions, Thames and Hudson, Chronicle and so many others who are truly producing the brightest and best non fiction books for kids these days.
Read More
It's been widely reported many, many times that reluctant readers - particularly boys but definitely both boys and girls - are quite often more interested in non-fiction than fiction. I can't quite remember how it first came about that we made huge efforts to stimulate Charlotte's reading with a good mix of fiction and non-fiction titles but it was certainly quite soon after we'd joined our local library for the first time.
For children, libraries can often be the only place they'll be exposed to 'learning books' outside of school but for most kids, it's also the place where they are in direct control of what they read - and what non-fiction titles they pick up alongside story and picture books.
That's hugely important, and from the outset it's really quite something to see a child going through the non-fiction section in a library's stacks and seeing what they pull out.
Charlotte's love of history and science stems directly from the way we gently coaxed her towards digging out books in the non-fiction section - often gloriously illustrated and packed full of facts, these books tell their own stories to children and definitely in the case of history books, are often as full of amazing characters and 'plot twists' as any story book you can name.
I doubt many teachers would actively discourage a child from reading non-fiction for pleasure (so I'm rather intrigued by the background to this tweet). After all, a huge part of a teacher's role is to engage their class with the subject matter at hand - so if a child displays enough interest in the subject to want to explore it outside school as well, what's not to love?
Unless...there's some bizarre theory that non-fiction should not be 'dumbed down'. It should be wholly academic, perhaps some might say even 'dry' so it does not muddy the message it's trying to impart. Perhaps it's that we're now so petrified that our children won't learn if they're having fun that children's non-fiction is somehow frowned upon?
If that's the case, again I'd have to disagree and point out that you'd have to search high and low to find a non-fiction title these days that 'dumbs down' its subject - simply because kids will not put up with that in their non-fiction reading matter just like they won't put up with poorly written (or illustrated) fiction (and gawd, how many times do we have to point this out to would-be children's writers - that children are not there to be babied or patronised with hollow stories that don't inspire them or satisfy their curiosity?)
It does seem that it's long been the belief that a certain amount of 'talking down to' is required when you're broaching certain topics and subjects with kids (again whether in fictional or non-fictional titles) and I'd have to once again vociferously argue that this truly is not the case. Kids are like hungry sponges when it comes to facts and figures. You wouldn't try to wash with a sponge that was only given a tiny drip of water would you?
Do celebrate National Non-Fiction Month again this November as many book folk will be doing so! Mix it up a bit in your own children's reading materials for that month and I promise you, you'll be very pleasantly surprised by the results! Go seek out brilliant books by publishers like Usborne, Flying Eye Books, Wide Eyed Editions, Thames and Hudson, Chronicle and so many others who are truly producing the brightest and best non fiction books for kids these days.
Thursday, 15 October 2015
When is the best time to introduce your child to the Harry Potter universe? A ReadItDaddy Editorial
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
October 15, 2015
Labels:
Bloomsbury Children's Books,
Books,
Children's Books,
Harry Potter,
J.K. Rowling,
The Philosopher's Stone
As the scales begin to tip firmly in the favour of chapter books for Charlotte, it's almost inevitable that there'll be a crossover point where she will spot books on our shelves and want to read them herself or have them read to her.
The Harry Potter series is one such set of books, which have held Charlotte's interest after watching one or two bits of the early movies (and only the early ones, mind you - the later ones really need to wait a few more years before I'll let her loose on them). She wanted to know more about the books and so recently we started to read them at bedtimes.
Charlotte is 7 - and really this editorial sneakingly broaches a subject that absolutely bakes my noodle. The subject of age ratings on books, which quite often make no sense to us whatsoever. "Here's a great picture book series for ages 5-8" a press release will proclaim. When we dive into the book we very quickly realise that the age group 5-8 is one hell of a long time and possibly the time in a child's life where their reading ability rapidly changes and develops the most.
Age ratings seem to be used to describe reading ability, and again I take issue with anything that tries to neatly pigeonhole a child's ability to fully engage or soak up a book's content, or to struggle with it not through non-recognition of the words or intent that make up the story, but purely because it's really not for them. I've seen Charlotte (who I believe has a very good level of reading ability and skill) struggle with a book that she should be breezing through - only for me to take a closer look at the book and find it the most turgid load of tummy rubbish imaginable. No fault of the child's reading ability, but entirely the fault of the editor or publisher that let it loose in the first place (I would say author but the assumption for a commercially published book is that an editor would have correctly gauged a book's suitability for publication if it was aimed at a specific reader level).
Age groupings on books for children (groupings rather than ratings) that follow the national curriculum recommendations or perhaps a reading scheme's framework can be frustrating to follow for readers with ability, yet they are structured to ensure that the gradual process of learning to read and learning to cope with the complexities of the English language are appropriately tested and matched. We don't often see this happen in books that children read for fun, so it makes me wonder why books below a certain threshold have any sort of age groupings at all?
How old should a child be before they're let loose on J.K. Rowling's works? The real answer is "When they're emotionally well equipped enough to deal with the story's content" - which for Charlotte is certainly at her age for the early books, and maybe 5-6 years for the last 3 or 4.
Having the chance to revisit the books through her eyes (having read them many many times myself independently) it has been a hell of a buzz to experience the sheer joy of getting to know a set of book characters who have (in no small part) been responsible for a colossal upsurge of interest in learning to read for sheer pleasure amongst children and teens. Rowling got the balance so absolutely right, ensuring that the Harry Potter books contained plenty to engage children across all genders, classes and races. Her characters are not perfect in any way, they have human frailties and flaws. Her good guys and gals are good but not beyond breaking the rules when they feel they need to. Her bad guys and gals are thoroughly rotten, but there's always the faint hope that underneath their dark exteriors they've got an unshakeable faith that they're doing the right thing. Her truly bad guys and gals make you understand that sometimes evil serves no greater purpose than being the measure of darkness that a story requires to set the baseline against.
You know you're doing something right as a parent when your child can spend an entire Saturday carrying around a twig they've found on the ground, pausing momentarily to shake it at a tree shouting "Expelliarmus" or "Expecto Patronum" but you really know you've done the right thing as a parent when another person (in this case an adult) can walk up to them and say "Is that your wand?"
In answer to the question posed in the header of this editorial, the right time is when you as a parent think your child is ready to deal with the highs and lows of a true rollercoaster of a story, not when an age rating tells you otherwise.
Edit: There's an absolutely brilliant book-by-book guide to the Harry Potter series and their suitability for school grades on Mrs N's highly educational and fantastically written blog. Go check it out!
Read More
The Harry Potter series is one such set of books, which have held Charlotte's interest after watching one or two bits of the early movies (and only the early ones, mind you - the later ones really need to wait a few more years before I'll let her loose on them). She wanted to know more about the books and so recently we started to read them at bedtimes.
Charlotte is 7 - and really this editorial sneakingly broaches a subject that absolutely bakes my noodle. The subject of age ratings on books, which quite often make no sense to us whatsoever. "Here's a great picture book series for ages 5-8" a press release will proclaim. When we dive into the book we very quickly realise that the age group 5-8 is one hell of a long time and possibly the time in a child's life where their reading ability rapidly changes and develops the most.
Age ratings seem to be used to describe reading ability, and again I take issue with anything that tries to neatly pigeonhole a child's ability to fully engage or soak up a book's content, or to struggle with it not through non-recognition of the words or intent that make up the story, but purely because it's really not for them. I've seen Charlotte (who I believe has a very good level of reading ability and skill) struggle with a book that she should be breezing through - only for me to take a closer look at the book and find it the most turgid load of tummy rubbish imaginable. No fault of the child's reading ability, but entirely the fault of the editor or publisher that let it loose in the first place (I would say author but the assumption for a commercially published book is that an editor would have correctly gauged a book's suitability for publication if it was aimed at a specific reader level).
Age groupings on books for children (groupings rather than ratings) that follow the national curriculum recommendations or perhaps a reading scheme's framework can be frustrating to follow for readers with ability, yet they are structured to ensure that the gradual process of learning to read and learning to cope with the complexities of the English language are appropriately tested and matched. We don't often see this happen in books that children read for fun, so it makes me wonder why books below a certain threshold have any sort of age groupings at all?
How old should a child be before they're let loose on J.K. Rowling's works? The real answer is "When they're emotionally well equipped enough to deal with the story's content" - which for Charlotte is certainly at her age for the early books, and maybe 5-6 years for the last 3 or 4.
Having the chance to revisit the books through her eyes (having read them many many times myself independently) it has been a hell of a buzz to experience the sheer joy of getting to know a set of book characters who have (in no small part) been responsible for a colossal upsurge of interest in learning to read for sheer pleasure amongst children and teens. Rowling got the balance so absolutely right, ensuring that the Harry Potter books contained plenty to engage children across all genders, classes and races. Her characters are not perfect in any way, they have human frailties and flaws. Her good guys and gals are good but not beyond breaking the rules when they feel they need to. Her bad guys and gals are thoroughly rotten, but there's always the faint hope that underneath their dark exteriors they've got an unshakeable faith that they're doing the right thing. Her truly bad guys and gals make you understand that sometimes evil serves no greater purpose than being the measure of darkness that a story requires to set the baseline against.
You know you're doing something right as a parent when your child can spend an entire Saturday carrying around a twig they've found on the ground, pausing momentarily to shake it at a tree shouting "Expelliarmus" or "Expecto Patronum" but you really know you've done the right thing as a parent when another person (in this case an adult) can walk up to them and say "Is that your wand?"
In answer to the question posed in the header of this editorial, the right time is when you as a parent think your child is ready to deal with the highs and lows of a true rollercoaster of a story, not when an age rating tells you otherwise.
Edit: There's an absolutely brilliant book-by-book guide to the Harry Potter series and their suitability for school grades on Mrs N's highly educational and fantastically written blog. Go check it out!
Thursday, 17 September 2015
Should Book Bloggers be paid for their words of wisdom? A ReadItDaddy Editorial
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
September 17, 2015
Labels:
A ReadItDaddy Editorial,
Books,
critique,
freelance writing,
payment for blogging how preposterous
Stop right there before reading any further if you think this is a heavy hint disguised as a ReadItDaddy editorial. We're delving into the often controversial subject of blogger remuneration and it's going to be a bit like walking through a minefield carrying a sack of hyperactive hyenas while wearing roller skates.
Most book bloggers reach a point in their blogging where they consider ways and means to make the blog start earning a crust. After all, it's been sitting around consuming your time for years so it's about time the lazy wretch earned its keep.
Of course, monetising your blog to the point where it's actually worthwhile isn't easy, and though we're often entertained by stories in the media about beauty bloggers nailing six figure sums to talk about lippie, or foodie bloggers somehow reaching the stratospheric heights of negotiating lucrative cookbook deals off the back of their sticky toffee pudding recipes, it's very rare to see a book blog that achieves similar success.
Though this isn't the focus of today's editorial. The focus is on you, as a blogger, being lucky enough to be asked to write content or produce articles for others - specifically publishers, organisations or other individuals who want to use your content on their own sites, promotional materials or perhaps even their own books.
The sticky tricky subject of blogger payment assumes that the majority of book bloggers already DO receive payment - in that they get to read, review and eventually keep the books that they're sent by publishers and PRs and - from our perspective - that's perfectly acceptable, in fact I think it's rather generous when you consider what books cost and how much you would be shelling out per year if you bought the books you received for review.
Any blogger charging for critique is (purely in my opinion) not only cheating their audience, but they're also cheating the person whose work they're reviewing. There are exceptions of course, there are folk who have spent a long time in the children's publishing industry who quite rightly charge for crits and consultancy - but these are folk who have the experience, the qualification and the background to be able to give a structured and professional opinion.
Most blogger who review books will (like us) stick to a rigid set of blogger ethics, reviewing books they want to review and giving a good solid and honest opinion of those books regardless of their net worth, and they'll also make a point of mentioning when a book was sent to them for review by a publisher or author. This definitely helps offer a level of transparency to your intended audience and is definitely worth considering.
But again we're getting bogged down in the critique side of things, I'm trying to get around to the subject at hand - the business of making a living from your writing when you're producing exclusive content that offers a (hopefully) informed and interesting article or opinion drawn from your own experiences when writing a book blog.
In the few cases where we've been asked to provide content like that, the subject of payment or remuneration is never broached. Obviously there's the inferred 'lure' of a magical boost in your blog's readership off the back of being featured somewhere that gets a few more hits than you do, but be honest, has that EVER worked out for you if you've been in a similar situation?
Freelance writers will usually have a ready-prepared tally of charges if they're already well established, so perhaps one approach is to see if you can contact a few and see what a reasonable rate is for an article with a specific word count. It's also important to consider the legality of making a living from your writing when it comes to the dreaded 'T' word. Thoroughly research the convoluted rules and regulations about how much you're allowed to earn before paying tax on what is effectively an income (in fact this is the very thing that puts me off bothering to badger for payment for writing or other stuff I do in my spare time, it hardly seems worth the hassle unless you're suddenly flooded with tons of freelance writing gigs that are lucrative and viable (and again, be honest, how many times does a blogger get a lucrative writing gig?)
It would be nice to not be considered the 'bottom of the barrel' when it comes to writing from time to time. I've seen a lot of rather harsh and unfair criticism levelled at bloggers by artists and authors who prefer professional critique (Read: Newspaper or Magazine articles) and entirely discount blogger reviews (or for that matter Amazon reviews but I can pretty much see why they're not big fans of the latter).
They're in the minority though, and quite often they may feel this way purely because they may assume that book bloggers are ten-a-penny and that anyone with an internet connection and a laptop can set up a blog, nip to the library, grab a stack of books and start ranting about them.
Perhaps then this is where the perception that blogger writing doesn't deserve payment ultimately comes from. I'm sure most of the lovely folk we've met through this blog (and the ones we haven't) all get that slightly weird sideways glance from other folk when they tell them that they write about children's books for fun.
But by and large we're passionate folk. I don't think I've met any book bloggers who are doing it 'purely for the freebies' and I've never met any who just copy and paste the same review over and over again, changing the names of the books or authors to suit. We do this in our spare time because we like doing it, we do this in our spare time because our kids love books and we do this in our spare time because once in a while someone says something nice about something you've written or an opinion you've offered and that feels damned good.
Sorry, this has gone on and on so will respect anyone who just comments TL;DR and skips to the end. To summarise, please don't ask a blogger to work for 'free' if you're asking them to provide unique content for your own publications, it does feel a bit like a slap in the chops and even the shortest article will still be eating up a bit of their most valuable resource - Time.
Read More
Most book bloggers reach a point in their blogging where they consider ways and means to make the blog start earning a crust. After all, it's been sitting around consuming your time for years so it's about time the lazy wretch earned its keep.
Of course, monetising your blog to the point where it's actually worthwhile isn't easy, and though we're often entertained by stories in the media about beauty bloggers nailing six figure sums to talk about lippie, or foodie bloggers somehow reaching the stratospheric heights of negotiating lucrative cookbook deals off the back of their sticky toffee pudding recipes, it's very rare to see a book blog that achieves similar success.
Though this isn't the focus of today's editorial. The focus is on you, as a blogger, being lucky enough to be asked to write content or produce articles for others - specifically publishers, organisations or other individuals who want to use your content on their own sites, promotional materials or perhaps even their own books.
The sticky tricky subject of blogger payment assumes that the majority of book bloggers already DO receive payment - in that they get to read, review and eventually keep the books that they're sent by publishers and PRs and - from our perspective - that's perfectly acceptable, in fact I think it's rather generous when you consider what books cost and how much you would be shelling out per year if you bought the books you received for review.
Any blogger charging for critique is (purely in my opinion) not only cheating their audience, but they're also cheating the person whose work they're reviewing. There are exceptions of course, there are folk who have spent a long time in the children's publishing industry who quite rightly charge for crits and consultancy - but these are folk who have the experience, the qualification and the background to be able to give a structured and professional opinion.
Most blogger who review books will (like us) stick to a rigid set of blogger ethics, reviewing books they want to review and giving a good solid and honest opinion of those books regardless of their net worth, and they'll also make a point of mentioning when a book was sent to them for review by a publisher or author. This definitely helps offer a level of transparency to your intended audience and is definitely worth considering.
But again we're getting bogged down in the critique side of things, I'm trying to get around to the subject at hand - the business of making a living from your writing when you're producing exclusive content that offers a (hopefully) informed and interesting article or opinion drawn from your own experiences when writing a book blog.
In the few cases where we've been asked to provide content like that, the subject of payment or remuneration is never broached. Obviously there's the inferred 'lure' of a magical boost in your blog's readership off the back of being featured somewhere that gets a few more hits than you do, but be honest, has that EVER worked out for you if you've been in a similar situation?
Freelance writers will usually have a ready-prepared tally of charges if they're already well established, so perhaps one approach is to see if you can contact a few and see what a reasonable rate is for an article with a specific word count. It's also important to consider the legality of making a living from your writing when it comes to the dreaded 'T' word. Thoroughly research the convoluted rules and regulations about how much you're allowed to earn before paying tax on what is effectively an income (in fact this is the very thing that puts me off bothering to badger for payment for writing or other stuff I do in my spare time, it hardly seems worth the hassle unless you're suddenly flooded with tons of freelance writing gigs that are lucrative and viable (and again, be honest, how many times does a blogger get a lucrative writing gig?)
It would be nice to not be considered the 'bottom of the barrel' when it comes to writing from time to time. I've seen a lot of rather harsh and unfair criticism levelled at bloggers by artists and authors who prefer professional critique (Read: Newspaper or Magazine articles) and entirely discount blogger reviews (or for that matter Amazon reviews but I can pretty much see why they're not big fans of the latter).
They're in the minority though, and quite often they may feel this way purely because they may assume that book bloggers are ten-a-penny and that anyone with an internet connection and a laptop can set up a blog, nip to the library, grab a stack of books and start ranting about them.
Perhaps then this is where the perception that blogger writing doesn't deserve payment ultimately comes from. I'm sure most of the lovely folk we've met through this blog (and the ones we haven't) all get that slightly weird sideways glance from other folk when they tell them that they write about children's books for fun.
But by and large we're passionate folk. I don't think I've met any book bloggers who are doing it 'purely for the freebies' and I've never met any who just copy and paste the same review over and over again, changing the names of the books or authors to suit. We do this in our spare time because we like doing it, we do this in our spare time because our kids love books and we do this in our spare time because once in a while someone says something nice about something you've written or an opinion you've offered and that feels damned good.
Sorry, this has gone on and on so will respect anyone who just comments TL;DR and skips to the end. To summarise, please don't ask a blogger to work for 'free' if you're asking them to provide unique content for your own publications, it does feel a bit like a slap in the chops and even the shortest article will still be eating up a bit of their most valuable resource - Time.
Friday, 25 April 2014
Celebrate 100 years of "Tarzan" with a fantastic range of books and merchandise to compliment the fabulous new "Tarzan" movie
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
April 25, 2014
Labels:
Books,
Centenary,
Edgar Rice Burroughs,
Merchandise,
Movie,
Tarzan
![]() |
| Get your best jungle hollers prepared - Tarzan is returning! |
Check out Andy Briggs' new Tarzan books at his Website.
We've got some great activity sheets for you to download and print - Click the links below, crack out your best colouring pencils and colour Tarzan in!
Tarzan Activity Sheet 1 (PDF Download)
Tarzan Activity Sheet 2 (PDF Download)
Tarzan Activity Sheet 3 (PDF Download)
As you can see from the photo above, there will be lots of gorgeous merchandise to accompany the movie too. Watch out soon for competitions and opportunities to win these fabulous items.
Tarzan Activity Sheet 2 (PDF Download)
Tarzan Activity Sheet 3 (PDF Download)
As you can see from the photo above, there will be lots of gorgeous merchandise to accompany the movie too. Watch out soon for competitions and opportunities to win these fabulous items.
![]() |
| Colour Tarzan in with our fab activity sheet downloads! |
Monday, 10 March 2014
Why gender books suck - A small missive in support of "Let Books Be Books"
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
March 10, 2014
Labels:
Books,
Gender stereotyping,
let books be books,
let toys be toys
![]() |
| It's not exactly new, this 'gender stereotyping in children's books' thing... |
We've been supporters of the campaign to remove gender stereotyping in kid's toys for ages. "Let Toys Be Toys" has now grown into "Let Books Be Books" - it's probably no real surprise that it's something we got on our high horse about back in April last year - Twice in fact - and a wee bit back in 2012 too.
Looking back at those posts, it's actually good to see such a high profile campaign finally hitting the headlines, and garnering a huge amount of support almost universally across the Twittersphere and Blogosphere - but it does need to go further than that. Given the successes that "Let Toys Be Toys" had with getting retailers to change their ways, removing gender stereotype labelling from stores and some toy lines, I'm hoping to see the same thing happen with children's books.
It's extremely frustrating as parents of a little girl who DOES like pink, and DOES like dolls to feel some weird sense of guilt every time Charlotte reacts positively to imagery or books that fall into those hideous gender-stereotype pigeonholes. I have always hated pigeonholing of any kind. In fact the campaign as a whole should just be "Let kids be kids" - because it really isn't something that's neatly specific to things children are bought or accrue during their young lives.
Charlotte has always been brought up with encouragement to pursue whatever avenues of play she desires. At home currently, her bedroom contains things that some folk would call "girly" such as Barbie Dolls, Lego Friends toys etc - but there are also two WRC radio controlled cars (thankfully that weren't labelled as 'boys toys' in any way), a whole host of 'normal' Lego, kinex sets, a magic set and a ton of other toys that we have bought without even pausing to glance at what section they were in, or what colour the box art was.
We take the same approach with books, and though we do get sent books from time to time that are fairly swiftly tossed aside and never really feature highly in the 'read and re-read' stakes (or for that matter, in our "Book of the Week" slot - note to authors, illustrators, publishers and retailers: Gender-specific books are often the first to get 'culled' when we have a book clearout).
The worst thing is the implied insult that gender stereotyping is needed - for anything, not just books - to somehow ease the pain of selecting something that's appropriate for your child. I feel moderately the same way about age ratings for books too. Obviously some books need it (for instance, you wouldn't really want your 9 year old reading racy YA that's too violent / adult) but some of the age groupings for children's books are puzzling. We often find our weekly haul stretches between books meant for 3-5 year olds, right through to stuff recommended for 7-11. Charlotte is 6 and can comfortably browse and pick between the whole range because of her reading ability and ability to understand some of the stuff that's neatly pigeonholed as 'too complex for 6 year olds'.
With the gender thing, the implied insult doesn't just affect us but anyone who buys books or toys for her. Why do marketers think that people are entirely incapable of choosing what their children play with, and (ARGH) why the colour thing? Why does colour even factor into gender at all? Why do most people always think it comes down to pink or blue?
The worst thing is the implied insult that gender stereotyping is needed - for anything, not just books - to somehow ease the pain of selecting something that's appropriate for your child. I feel moderately the same way about age ratings for books too. Obviously some books need it (for instance, you wouldn't really want your 9 year old reading racy YA that's too violent / adult) but some of the age groupings for children's books are puzzling. We often find our weekly haul stretches between books meant for 3-5 year olds, right through to stuff recommended for 7-11. Charlotte is 6 and can comfortably browse and pick between the whole range because of her reading ability and ability to understand some of the stuff that's neatly pigeonholed as 'too complex for 6 year olds'.
With the gender thing, the implied insult doesn't just affect us but anyone who buys books or toys for her. Why do marketers think that people are entirely incapable of choosing what their children play with, and (ARGH) why the colour thing? Why does colour even factor into gender at all? Why do most people always think it comes down to pink or blue?
Once again, hooray for this campaign. We'll be backing it all the way!
Monday, 7 January 2013
Spotlight on "Max 'n' Me", a fantastic book project from an autistic boy and his supermum
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
January 07, 2013
Labels:
Autism,
Books,
Childhood Development,
Creativity,
Max and Me,
Max from the Planet of Cool
Just as we closed up for Christmas we received a really fab letter from a mum about her child's books. We love seeing people's self published books, and what made us sit up and take notice of Max and his mum's mail was their situation.
Max has autism, and through producing picture books, they're working through ways of using books as therapy for Max and as an utterly brilliant way of enhancing his creativity. "Max from the Planet of Cool" is their first book and more are coming in 2013.
From the Max and Me blog:
"Max from the Planet of Cool is the first collaborative book written and illustrated by Max ‘n Me. The inspiration for this book came from a giant transition in our life as we moved from Olympia, Washington to Tacoma Washington (30 miles north) and Max found himself in a new school with new kids and we were both totally unprepared for how difficult this transition would be."
Saturday, 29 December 2012
2012 - That was the year that was - Part 2 (April, May, June) ReadItDaddy takes a retrospective look back at a year in Children's Books
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
December 29, 2012
Labels:
2012,
2012 Yearly Roundup Part 2,
Books,
ReadItDaddy
We re-reviewed Helen Cooper's utterly essential "The Bear Under the Stairs" - a book which has probably been one of the most demanded "read it again, Daddy" requests over the past year, and a worthy "Book of the Week" on its second outing on the blog. When we first took a look at it, I uttered some silly nanny-like concerns over its content, thinking it was probably a bit too sinister for children and definitely shouldn't be read anywhere near bedtime. Despite this, Charlotte loves it and I think it's because it really does blur the lines - is William really imagining the bear, or is he sometimes imagining it and sometimes it's real? Or is it just real and hiding out in the under-stairs cupboard.
Charlotte doesn't care - basically she keeps asking for this one for several reasons. 1) The brilliant artwork (spotting as many hidden bears as you can is almost a game in itself) 2) I think she secretly likes it being a bit scary and a bit dark and disturbing and 3) She seems to like the daft gurgling voice I give the bear when I read this. We finally got round to buying a copy from Mostly Books (and finally got recognised in there after several incognito trips!) and it still regularly finds a place in our reading roster.
Elsewhere in April we checked out "The Worst Princess" by Anna Kemp and Sara Ogilvie, one of the first books that Publishers sent us for review (we're still a little bit shellshocked that this happens, but we couldn't be more grateful, really we couldn't!) A great alternative take on the traditional "Princess" tale, The Worst Princess isn't anyone's fool. She doesn't need pretty dresses or being locked up in a tower, she wants to have fun and adventure just like any girl should. Hooray and amen to that! Charlotte loved Princess Paula to bits!
The fantastic Babette Cole made her second appearance with Doctor Dog and quite rightly won "Book of the Week" again with "A Dose of Doctor Dog" - We hear from the good lady herself that more Doctor Dog is being planned. Will we get to meet Mrs Doctor Dog after all? Best wait and see what happens in 2013 I guess!
We also took a look at Bruce Ingham and Allan Ahlberg's brilliant "The Runaway Dinner". Fast paced and fantastic, another classic that keeps being demanded in our reading schedule and one I'm always happy to dive into. Such a brilliant book.
We couldn't possibly follow up such a remarkable line up in May could we? Well we did try! First out of the traps in May was "We're going on a Bear Hunt" by Michael Rosen and Helen Oxenbury. I couldn't quite believe we hadn't reviewed it before - as it's a book that's been read to Charlotte ever since we was a tiny baby. It's a book that ratchets up the tension as the happy carefree family wade through snow, mud and rivers to get to a deep dark cave. I'm sure you know the rest but it's very easy to see why we had to bestow a book of the week award on this one.
May the 4th was with us but we didn't do anything Star Warsy, instead we re-reviewed Doctor Ted, a book that is brilliantly written, superbly illustrated and is full of the sort of cheeky irreverent stuff that children just can't get enough of. Again it's probably one of the most demanded books on our reading roster and Charlotte absolutely cannot get enough of it. We keep meaning to pick up the rest of the 'Ted' books by Andrea Beatty and Pascale Lemaitre, better stick them on the list for 2013 methinks as Doctor Ted is brilliant, brilliant, brilliant!
Eerie spooky coincidence in May. We pulled Maurice Sendak's meisterwork "Where the Wild Things Are" out of the library stacks in the same week Maurice died. It was a book I'd been meaning to show Charlotte for a while so it was a bit strange (and quite a bit sad) to think we'd never see another Sendak book. Hunt out "Bears" as well if you're looking to catch up with the great man's work.
Late to the party, we finally caught up with local boy David Melling's brilliant bear in "Hugless Douglas" which got 4 out of 5 stars back when we rated books (which on reflection was a bit of a daft idea, how can you possibly give a score to children's books really?) We're slowly hunting down the rest of Melling's books, we absolutely love his inky illustrations.
Another book of the week in May was Frieda Wishinsky and Neal Layton's utterly brilliant "Jennifer Jones Won't Leave Me Alone" and this is also a book that is constantly in demand whenever it's spotted in the library stacks (we really ought to get our own copy). Along with Cressida Cowell's superb 'Emily Brown' books, Neal's work has become a firm favourite and he's also a jolly nice bloke on Twitter too.
More brilliance in May with "When Martha's Away" (hey, that almost rhymes!) from Bruce Ingman, telling the story of the secret lives of cats. What do they do when you close the front door and head off to school / work? Rather more than you can possibly imagine. A brilliant brilliant book, not just for cat lovers.
Our last book of the week in may was "What's the Time, Grandma Wolf?" by Ken Brown. One of those delicious and cheeky reworkings of a classic fairy tale that has lots of unexpected twists and turns, and a fantastic ending. Want to know how it ends? You'd better go and track down a copy yourself.
Our thoughts turned to summer and flaming June. It wasn't actually too bad, but the rain made sure we had plenty of time for book reviews and despite having a brilliant week off at Disneyland Paris, we still managed to squeeze in 14 great little books.
First up in June was the rather disappointing "Socks" by Elizabeth Lindsay and Nick Sharratt. We'd loved Pants and More Pants, Socks felt like a book too far, felt forced and unfunny with some pretty appalling rhymes. It's not often we gave a book a 1 out of 5 star rating but this was one of the instances where a book got a pretty hefty thumbs down from Charlotte. She's harsh but fair. We did like the sock submarine but it just couldn't live up to its predecessors, or indeed Nick Sharratt's other brilliant books. Oh dear!
We took a look at scary French children's books and this was the first time we encountered "La Visite De Petit Mort" by Kitty Crowther. A book we've since managed to get a copy of, and have found isn't actually that scary. It's really rather cute. Check out the article though, they really do things differently across the channel and vive la difference at that!
Fresh from our trip to Disneyland Paris we picked up a couple of the brilliant Walter Foster "Learn to Draw" books to see if we could learn how to draw Disney Princesses. I still can't get Rapunzel's awesome hair flick right! Great books though and a great and very memorable holiday.
Our final book of the week for June was Peter Bently and Simon Rickerty's agile little monster "The Yoga Ogre". Brilliant knockabout fun and a book we're glad to see mentioned in people's "Best Children's Books of the Year" lists. Hooray!
Tune in again tomorrow for more of our yearly roundup as we edge nearer to starting school and take a look at July, August and September.
Thursday, 25 October 2012
Of Pink and Blue and Books - A ReadItDaddy Editorial
I apologise in advance for this mini rant. I recently found myself in the unique position of being a bit miffed about something encountered on a (usually quite excellent) book blog and felt compelled to add my two penneth. My two penneth was subsequently deleted from the blog without explanation (actually no, it wasn't even published) so I thought I'd air it here.
Our daughter (and the "boss" of this blog) Charlotte is a girl. Charlotte loves pink. Not exclusively, but she definitely loves pink.
When we first knew we were having a child, we wanted the surprise of not knowing the gender before the birth. Naturally this meant that before she was born and we went clothes / toy shopping, we opted for those drab beige and neutral colours that you can get most baby clothes in. We opted for a 'safe' coloured baby carrier and pram and picking our way through the minefield of what is now termed 'gender specific colours' wasn't a massive problem.
Now of course, it's a huge bone of contention for a lot of parents who feel that marketing is dictating to them what their girls and boys should like and should be into. As you can see from the attached pic, this goes beyond the mere 'gender specific colour differentiation' thing - it suggests that while boys love fast cars, dinosaurs, footballs and robots - girls prefer skipping ropes, princesses, bags and crowns.
(There's a clue in the word 'Marketing' by the way. Anyone in the business of making money from selling products wants to do a lot of it so that they can make more products, make more money - and so on, and so forth. That said, I have never met anyone involved in marketing that put me in a hurt hold, marched me down to a store and made me buy something while I screamed in protest).
When it comes to books, our choices are simple. We buy the books Charlotte wants to read. We show her books we think she'd like to read but not because these are books we'd rather she read in preference to others, even at 4 she's perfectly capable of making up her own mind (and don't we know it!)
We had a recent experience where Charlotte chose a pink covered book (Emma Dodd's "Cinderelephant" - which is a regularly demanded bedtime read, by the way. She loves it!) mostly because it was a huge pink book about Cinderella (as an elephant). We didn't think much to the book but we relented. Now, to our knowledge, Charlotte hasn't been brainwashed at preschool or school into liking pink or princesses, she just does. But Charlotte also likes robots, witches, dinosaurs (oh boy, does she ever love dinosaurs), monsters and a whole ton of other things that cross and re-cross the supposedly rigid 'forced on us' gender boundaries.
So what are we to make of the constant coverage in the book press, from publishers and from bloggers that suggest that huge sweeping changes need to be made in the industry to prevent the nefarious spread of gender stereotyping, particularly when the colour pink is involved?
Simple answer really. Stop pushing your own agendas, ideas and hangups on your children and let them choose what they read by introducing them to as broad a range and as many books as possible, whatever colour the covers are. No marketer alive can stop you doing that.
Wednesday, 19 September 2012
Avast me hearties! (Pieces of ) 8 Children's books with a piratical theme
Posted by
ReadItDaddy
at
September 19, 2012
Labels:
Books,
Jonny Duddle,
Little Princess,
Mr Jelly,
Peg Leg,
Pirate Books,
Pirates
Ahoy Jim Lad! What on earth could ye do on 'Talk Like a Pirate' Day if ye be a keen book swabbing blogger who sails the seven seas of children's books in search of booty?
Well you could stop talking silly and publish a lovely list of essential piratical books to tickle the fancies of any scurvy coves who pass by your blog. So that's exactly what we're going to do!
1) Pirate Girl by Cornelia Funke and Kerstin Meyer (Chicken House Books)
A young girl sets sail to visit her grandmother, and falls foul of the stinkiest, nastiest pirates ever seen. They soon put her to work swabbing the decks, darning their stinky socks and cooking for them in the galley. But the girl is smart, and has a secret plan to escape. For she is no ordinary girl, she is Pirate Girl.
An absolutely lovely little tale showing pirates as the rather daft, rather stinky and rather inept coves they really are.
ReadItDaddy Review Link to Pirate Girl
2) The Pirate Cruncher by Jonny Duddle (Templar Books)
Jonny Duddle is a past master at drawing pirates and now there's even a movie based on Pirates vs Scientists. We love The Pirate Cruncher though, mostly due to Jonny's fantastical pirates and creatures beautifully and deliciously painted in this book.
The Pirates band together to search out lost treasure (this tends to happen a lot in pirate books, unsurprisingly). But there's a sting in the tail of this tale, as the treasure is not what it seems, and the hapless pirates soon meet up with....(Dramatic drum roll) The Pirate Cruncher! ARGHH! Such a superb book!
Read More
Well you could stop talking silly and publish a lovely list of essential piratical books to tickle the fancies of any scurvy coves who pass by your blog. So that's exactly what we're going to do!
1) Pirate Girl by Cornelia Funke and Kerstin Meyer (Chicken House Books)
A young girl sets sail to visit her grandmother, and falls foul of the stinkiest, nastiest pirates ever seen. They soon put her to work swabbing the decks, darning their stinky socks and cooking for them in the galley. But the girl is smart, and has a secret plan to escape. For she is no ordinary girl, she is Pirate Girl.
An absolutely lovely little tale showing pirates as the rather daft, rather stinky and rather inept coves they really are.
ReadItDaddy Review Link to Pirate Girl
2) The Pirate Cruncher by Jonny Duddle (Templar Books)
Jonny Duddle is a past master at drawing pirates and now there's even a movie based on Pirates vs Scientists. We love The Pirate Cruncher though, mostly due to Jonny's fantastical pirates and creatures beautifully and deliciously painted in this book.
The Pirates band together to search out lost treasure (this tends to happen a lot in pirate books, unsurprisingly). But there's a sting in the tail of this tale, as the treasure is not what it seems, and the hapless pirates soon meet up with....(Dramatic drum roll) The Pirate Cruncher! ARGHH! Such a superb book!
3) Captain Flinn and the Pirate Dinosaurs by Giles Andrea and Russell Ayto (Puffin Books)
What could possibly be better than a book featuring pirates or a book featuring dinosaurs? A book featuring pirate dinosaurs. A group of youngsters on a boring school trip get more than they bargain for when they go through a secret door at their local museum. It's a portal to a world inhabited by a mean bunch of scoundrels, dinosaurs who also just happen to be pirates! They're kidnappers and thoroughly nasty sorts - so it's up to Captain Flinn to band together with his pals to save the day. A genius combination of 2 children's books mainstays, that's sure to impress the piratical socks off your youngsters.
4) The Man Whose Mother Was A Pirate by Margaret Mahy and Margaret Chamberlain (Puffin Books)
It's not easy being an ordinary everyday kind of guy when your mum is a dyed-in-the-wool piratical lass. Carrying on with normal life while she sets sail and hunts for treasure, wiggling a merry sea shanty as she goes. Soon the hero of this tale comes to realise there's more to life than accountancy, balancing books and generally putting up with the rat race to earn an honest coin.
A lovely touching little tale beautifully illustrated and chock full of plenty of yo ho hos and ar har hars!
5) The Troll by Julia Donaldson and David Roberts (Macmillan Children's Books)
We like our pirates to be a little bit hopeless. We like our trolls to be a little bit scary so Julia Donaldson's book "The Troll" mixes both together in a cross-over tale echoing The Three Billy Goats Gruff and throwing in pirates to create a heady mix of chaos.
It's not one that crops up whenever anyone's heaping praise on Julia Donaldson but we really liked this book and didn't know who to feel more sorry for, the troll or the pirates :)
6) Peg Leg by Sue Graves and Martin Remphry (Reading Corner Phonics)
A great little phonics book featuring lots of sounding out and repetition, Peg Leg tells a standard piratical yarn in a way that supports early learning and reading skills in a fun and immersive way. There are quite a few decent piratical phonics books around but this one was very well received by us, so it's worth searching out.
7) Mr Jelly and the Pirates by Roger Hargreaves (Egmont Books)
Astonishingly, we haven't reviewed this but it's one of Charlotte's favourite Little Miss / Mr Men books. Mr Jelly, the shivering quivering cowardly cove borrows Mr Lazy's lilo bed for a dip in the ocean one afternoon. After Mr Lazy accidentally (!) lets go of the rope tethering Mr Jelly to the shore, Jelly sets sail for adventure and mishaps - and meets some dastardly pirates.
The poor little fellah soon finds himself pressganged into work on the pirate's ship but things don't quite go according to plan, and Mr Jelly's cowardly behaviour soon rubs off on the pirates themselves!
8) I Want To Be A Pirate (Little Princess Book) by Tony Ross (Andersen Children's Books)
The Little Princess is the final saucy cove on our list, and in "I Want To Be A Pirate" she pinches the admiral's hat, boats and telescope and becomes a naughty little pirate. Very soon though, she realises that a pirate's lot is not a happy one and no one wants to play with her while she's indulging in typical pirate-like behaviour.
Tony Ross's Little Princess books are great and this book was also one of the episodes in the "Little Princess" TV show. Yo ho!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























